Sacrifice and the black family

Written by Tami Winfrey Harris, ARP editor

When black families do what white families do instinctively and routinely—somehow, it pisses people right off. Taking advantage of the benefits that hard work, achievement, success or circumstance bring our way means selling out, abandoning our people, getting “uppity.” No sending the kids to private schools or heading to the suburbs. It is not enough that we understand failing educational systems or that we work to fix them. We must sacrifice our families to them. It is our burden.

… I do not know why Barack and Michelle Obama cannot send their children to a nice public school in Hyde Park. You understand that I am a bit unstable this election season (I voted for Hillary) and I do my research by erratically Googling from home. And all I know about Hyde Park — and, readers, I’d love to be corrected if I’m wrong — is that even though real estate prices seem high, the brave little public schools in its ZIP code seem to be flailing. Their scores on www.greatschools.net are largely 2’s and 4’s (on a scale of 1 to 10, 10 being the best). When you read the tea leaves as manically as I do, those low numbers suggest that few children of educated, middle-class parents are attending the local schools. Rather, they’ve withdrawn, with nary a ripple, into their whispery private enclaves.

Let us not even touch the term “community organizer,” so buffeted about, by both sides, like a balloon at a rock concert. Let us just say that if Mr. and Mrs. Obama — a dynamic, Harvard-educated couple — had chosen public over private school, they could have lifted up not just their one local public school, but a family of schools. First, given the social pressure (or the social persuasion of wanting to belong to the cool club), more educated, affluent families would tip back into the public school fold. And second, the presence of educated type-A parents with too much time on their hands ensures that schools are held, daily, to high standards. Read more…

In “The rantings of a P.T.A. mom,” Sandra Tsing Loh’s recent New York Times article, the author marvels at how the Obama’s have chosen to educate their children. Loh mentions that Joe Biden and John McCain’s children went to private schools, but the family that seems to stoke her ire is the Obama family. It is okay for a young Chelsea Clinton to attend the private Sidwell Friends School in Washington, but how dare those presumptuous Obamas offer their daughters a private education. The local school’s low scores matter not. Why, if the Obamas would just take one for the team and chance their daughters’ educations, surely other families would follow…eventually.

Understand—I am an advocate of public schooling. I am the child of educators. I went to public school. My stepson goes to public school. But all public schools are not created equal. A lot of school systems, particularly the Chicago Public School system, are in crisis, and we all need to work to fix this. But if parents know that they are not able to make up for a poor school’s inadequacies, and if they are lucky enough to have options, they should not be blamed for choosing what is best for the family. Or, (if I recall correctly from The Audacity of Hope) if children have access to a FREE excellent private school education courtesy of a university where a parent teaches, they should be able to take advantage of it. No one need sacrifice their children to correct society’s wrongs.

The choices we make

I don’t know how the Obamas make decisions regarding their daughters’ educations. But I do know that many urban families, particularly black families living in areas like Hyde Park, Chicago, face uniquely difficult choices. My family did.

How do I find myself living in a small Indiana town today? Many reasons, but one of the most important is my stepson. We looked at the public schools in our Chicago area (We have lived in Hyde Park and the city’s near South Side) and found them lacking. We watched our son’s elementary school repeatedly get failing scores and narrow its curriculum to a bare minimum. Plus, we also looked at our small condominium and knew that while it was great for two, it wouldn’t do for a growing family. We looked at the city’s violent crime rates and we heard about too many children dying. Even with our good jobs, we could see no affordable place in the city that would provide the things we wanted most for our family. Private school was unaffordable, as was a home near our jobs that was big enough for three and maybe a dog. With hard work and luck, our family has been blessed with choices. And we chose to move away from the city. I am not saying ours was the best choice. It was simply the choice we could make work.

But I hear black families who make choices like mine or the Obamas’ demonized by the black community for abandoning our brethren and I hear our decisions questioned by people like Sandra Tsing Loh.

About five years ago, the Chicago Tribune published an article about how urban middle class black families are more likely to live in close proximity to urban crime and blight than similar white families. They are likely to continue to suffer the stress of poverty even if they have been successful in avoiding or overcoming it. Failing schools are part of the bargain. But that is to be our plight, it seems. Or, put more bluntly, that is our place. Even if, like the Obamas, we have the resources to seek better schooling, safer housing, etc., we are not to use them. If our kids come to college less-than-prepared…if a bullet finds one of our babies walking home from some extra-curricular activity…tsk, tsk…ain’t it a shame.

Only a black person in America could possibly be demonized for studying hard, earning a degree from an Ivy League institution, giving up a high-paying job to work for the community, getting a law degree, entering public service, becoming a successful author and lecturer, and offering his child the best education possible. It sounds like the American dream, but it’s not when we do it.

And yes, I know I appear to be ranting on like a pit bull without lipstick, which brings me to the final nail in the coffin in this sorry election year. As a Democrat I am horrified that Sarah Palin is the one who snagged the deeply profound — and absolutely ignored by professional smart people — emotional real estate of “P.T.A. mother.” I too am, in fact, not just “my kids’ mom” but their Title I Los Angeles public school P.T.A. secretary. This unheard female howl is, for better or worse, what Ms. Palin has set out to tap into; it is real, and I am sick that we’ve let the Republicans charge this ground.

Sarah Palin’s children went to what looks like a humble little public school: Iditarod
Elementary on Wasilla Fishhook Road. The school’s score on www.greatschools.net
is a 4. That’s a lot of street cred, for a gun-totin’, snow-mobilin’ creationist-lovin’ lady.

See, Obamas, if public school is good enough for the Palins, why is it not good enough for the son of a Kenyan goat herder and the descendant of African slaves?

Personally, I am more interested in education policy that the “emotional real estate of P.T.A. mother.” Loh’s view of Palinesque iconic parenthood seems to advance one concept of parenting as being supreme and noble. What about those moms and dads in inner city Chicago, working multiple jobs or odd hours, who can’t make it to P.T.A. meetings but love their children nonetheless? What of the parents who are pained because their children attend substandard schools? What about private school parents and boarding school parents? What about stepmoms like me who work a distance from home and thus are unable to be as involved in school activities as my stay-at-home and work-from-home counterparts? Is the Palin howl for us, too? Or is the battle cry just for moms who make Loh-approved decisions and black folks who don’t get big ideas about what their children deserve?

I know that Loh searched long and hard to find a suitable L.A. public school for her child (See her book, “Mom on Fire.”). That was her choice. Every child in this country deserves a good education. It is a shame that our country has not made that a priority. I hope that will change soon. Until then, though, every parent has a right to seek the best education they can provide for their children without apology—every parent: the black and the Harvard-educated, too. Parenting is hard and the decisions we make are unique and often informed by factors those on the outside cannot see. Before she drafts another sneering attack on another parent, Ms. Loh would do well to remember this.

See my post “I Colonize” about the challenges of urban living.

Share and Enjoy:These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us
  • digg
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Furl
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • co.mments

Trackbacks & Pings

  1. Jeremy Adam Smith on 15 Sep 2008 at 4:12 pm

    […] Sacrifice and the Black Family. “When black families do what white families do instinctively and routinely—somehow, it pisses people right off.” […]

Comments

  1. atlasien wrote:

    Loh’s argument is extremely insulting. Race aside, I went to crappy public schools up through the 9th grade, and I don’t believe my children should have to suffer the same. I’ll support public education through political measures and pay my fair share of taxes, but I want to give them better than I got.

    School decisions should be about what’s best for the children, not what makes the parent feel good about themselves.

    My son goes to a charter school, but if that didn’t work out, we were prepared to go private.

    Public schooling is a responsibility of ADULTS to fix. Not children.

  2. gm wrote:

    Thanks Tami for standing up for us. No one could have said it better.

  3. PureGracefulTree wrote:

    Great piece, Tami, thank you. I can’t help but consider this article along with the one by Delece Smith-Barrow posted last week about why she chose a PWI. If you choose to use your identity or resources to “save” a given institution, more power to you. But no one should have that responsibility forced upon them. I do remember Clinton coming under attack for choosing to send Chelsea to Sidwell Friends, and his response was that “A child should not be an instrument of policy.”

    It’s completely unacceptable that Loh focuses her tirade on the Obamas, whereas Biden and McCain simply get side mentions. I’m glad that most of the commenters on the article seem to get it and call her out.

  4. Atena wrote:

    Well said, Tami - thank you for articulating this. This is something I’ve struggled with now that my daughter is entering the public school system. Our ‘home’ school is one of the worst in the area (though supposedly improving), but because of my daughter’s special needs, she ended up in the better area school that has an elevator.

    I believe that school improvement happens through parent involvement and community organizing, and that it is unlikely that it will come from the top down (i.e. from the school system or local government). So, how does this work when parents with the skills and talent and wherewithall go private or charter, etc? It’s a problem.

    I know that given the option, I will choose a school that performs better, is safer, and has better facilities and amenities (or homeschooling, which is also an option). But I still feel responsible to support the school in my neighborhood. But do I have the time or energy for that? I don’t think so. But I haven’t tried it yet.

    Anyway - thanks for this.

  5. cwr wrote:

    Thank you so much for this post. Our urban school district, though underfunded, provides a good education for lots of kids, but the achievement gap remains. I have chosen private schools because I want my children to be held to the same high standard of performance as other children. They are capable of doing this and there is no reason for anyone to look at their skin and - even if it’s subconcious - expect less from them. I understand that we are blessed to be able to have this choice, so we work hard to try and make private education more accessible to other kids. Also, we support public schools with our tax dollars, and participate in fundraisers. But I will never apologize for trying to provide my children with the best education possible, and if that’s in private school, so be it. Sorry for the rant, but if I don’t expect good things from my children, and I allow others to expect less from them, what will they learn to expect from themselves?

  6. ohslowburn wrote:

    Thank you for this. I didn’t grow up in this country, and where I grew up, absolutely no one cares about “how it looks.” You get your kid the best, no matter what others have to say. Yes, that’s another extreme, no better than the “we must keep our kids in public school no matter what!” type of blinkered arguments.

    And I can tell you that there is nothing to be gained but your child’s unending resentment if s/he is shortchanged for some social engineering type idea the parent came up with in order to satisfy the “what will people say?” syndrome. I know because that happened to one of my parents.

    If it gives you any comfort, the overwhelming response to Sandra Tsing Loh’s article was on your side. In fact, one person put it perfectly - that it may be good policy but not good parenting to put your kid in a failing school, particularly just because you’re running for office.

  7. Delux wrote:

    they could have lifted up not just their one local public school, but a family of schools.

    And then they should have fixed up a cure for cancer, discovered how to reverse global warming, perfected a method of converting toxic waste into sunshine and daisies, and then found irrefutable proof of life on mars.

    Darn you, Barack and Michelle, for being such slackers!

  8. A.M. wrote:

    Your first paragraph sums it up excellently. I will be referencing this in arguments with idiots.

    (Referred here by LiveJournal user delux-vivens and djeannot.

  9. fa_ikaika wrote:

    Maybe the people who should be forced to send their kids to public schools are the people who actually work in the education bureaucracy, and the people who win elected office in a particular school district.

    While I agree that a child is not an instrument of public policy, my home state of Hawaii has ATROCIOUS public schools in no small part because they have been left for dead by the politically effective middle class who almost all send their kids to private schools.

    This is a much more complicated issue than simply the Obamas.

  10. Laura wrote:

    I have a question…
    If the two most diverse public schools in our city are the worst for funding and test scores are we a “terrible” family for putting our children in the school we are zoned for if they are the best funded with the best test scores in the district but the least diverse? Now, how about if we are a white family who has adopted a child of color?
    Laura

  11. BCmomtobe wrote:

    I have noticed that the biggest complainers are those who could not, or have not done anything to improve their own situation. They are jealous of anyone who has what they don’t, whether the ‘have’ person worked darn hard for it or not. Add to this an element of racism, the “Oh sure, they were given that because they are……”

    My brother told me of his friend, who is South Asian, and a surgeon. He is quite well to do, and his accent readily identifies him as an immigrant. He was buying something from a store, when a Caucasian man of lower economic means walked up and said, “You GD immigrants are taking all the good jobs.”

    He calmly responded, “When you go to Med school, you can have a good job too.”

    When anyone does good for themselves, there will always be someone griping about what others have that they don’t. When the ‘haves’ are people of colour, this is even more true. I say, just do what you’ve got to do for yourself, help others where you can, and enjoy.

  12. Deanna wrote:

    Since I don’t know the Obama’s, I would never be so presumptuous as to actually have an opinion on their choice of education for their children.

    As a parent with a child in the Chicago Public School system, I can share our experience, and only imagine similarities in the thought process. The fact that we are white and the Obama’s are African-American really seems irrelevant here–we are all parents who love our children and want to give them the best advantage possible in life.

    We right now also are grappling with wanting to stay at the public school, but feeling that we need to send our child to private school. Our neighborhood school is fine, but our child is gifted, and the public school system isn’t able provide the additonal challenge that will nurture a gifted mind. We feel that if we don’t send him to private school now that he may lose his edge while Chicago Public Schools (CPS) teaches to the test–it’s all about teaching what is necessary (not creative or inspiring) so all students, regardless of innate talent, will pass the ISAT. CPS High Schools also rate much lower than elementary and middle schools, and so the decision is not just about what to do this year, but what will we plan to do 7 years from now.

    I’m only imagining that with Barak and Michelle Obama as parents, there’s a good likelihood that both of their daughters are gifted.

    Race does not own the desire of every parent to want to provide the best they possibly can in life and to prepare them to make positive contributions to the world.

  13. Mary wrote:

    Laura,

    I too am wrestling with that problem of diversity vs. good schools, and will have to make that choice in a couple of years. I would like to hear others’ thoughts.

    Mary

  14. BCmomtobe wrote:

    Deanna wrote, “Race does not own the desire of every parent to want to provide the best they possibly can in life and to prepare them to make positive contributions to the world”

    I love how you said that. I am also a Special Ed. teacher, and gifted students fall under my wing in our system. I know this blog is about race, but I’m very passionate regarding the education of students who don’t ‘fit the middle’.

    I recommend that you give even more consideration to sending your son to a private school that can meet his needs as a gifted child. There are gifted students in our school, but no gifted classes. Roughly once a year, there is an activity day for the gifted kids in our district. At this event, one particular student in my school relaxes, and relates to the other students in a way he doesn’t in class. He has good social skills, and is well liked in his regular classroom; however I know he is holding back, and not wanting to seem weird. It is okay for him to be himself around students who are at his level.

    I teach in the public school system, and firmly believe in it, but I know we are not adequately meeting the needs of gifted students. I think your son may benefit socially, as well as academically, depending on the school.

  15. Angela Riccio wrote:

    Many public schools are failing their students, many of whom do not have a choice where they do to school.

    The Obama’s are not the problem and it sickens me that they are being given so much gruff for doing what any parent in their situation would do - send their children to the best schools that their economic position allowed.

    I know we moved to our town because the schools are so highly rated. There are few things more important for the success of our children than their education. It is even more vital for children of color, particularly if this or any generation is going to break the cycle of poverty bequeathed to so many by centuries of racism.

    If the school setting is not diverse, but the education is excellent perhaps the answer is to provide a child with extra opportunities outside of school to interact with people of color.

    We don’t live in the city for many reasons and the poor state of the public school system, as well as the unacceptable levels of violent crimes involving students are but a few. Our choice is a less diverse environment, but one where I don’t worry every day that my child will get shot.

    A

  16. Lu wrote:

    My partner, who is black, is from the South side of the Chi. When he was a child he got off his school buzz right smack dab in the middle of a gun fight. The bus sped off.

    If we move to Chicago (we live in KY now but are considering it) I will not hesitate to put our son in the best, and hopefully safest, school we can find. If that means private school, so be it. The lady who wrote that article has no place to judge the decisions of parents who risk their own lives, and put their family at risk as well, simply because they are a Black family who might be in the white house. Loh should be ashamed of herself. Maybe she has more in common with Palin than she would like to think.

  17. brenda wrote:

    Right on.

    My child attends a Chicago Public School (aside: it’s a gifted school—Deanna, did you do the testing for your child? It’s well worth it). We are very happy that we attend public school and that it meets her needs. (That’s a key point. If we couldn’t find a school that did, by all means we’d try to go private.) However, Obama’s kids had the opportunity to attend University of Chicago Lab School for free, as someone points out. I would laugh in the face of anyone who suggests they should have turned that down. No parent would.

  18. Gloria wrote:

    I am the product of Catholic School and public school. From my experience, public school doesn’t recognize or foster a black child’s talents and academic aptitude. I sent my son to private school for kindergarten, and charter school for elementary.
    He has been attending public shcool since middle school and is now in the 10th grade. He attends a “troubled” school now and did in middle school. I had to fight adminstrators to have him admitted to “gifted” programs because I saw him not being challenged or stimulated by the regular curriculm. When a black child is gifted, it is ofen overlooked in a public school setting, when white children are automatically placed in theses special programs. I have experienced first hand how private schools teach to the smartest children and expect all of the students to achieve success. And I’ve have seen public school teach to the least smart children and never realizing that the sharpest students become bored and disinterested with all of the repetition.
    Our society is a direct reflection of this philosophy. That is why we cannot be angry at the inept persons we choose to place in positions of authority or power when our very society breeds that type of thinking. We don’t teach our children to excel, we teach them to “go along”.
    I’m glad I fought the good fight and now my son is a successful Adavanced Placement, International Baccalaureate 1oth grader. But what is sad is that I fought because of my negative experience in public school. What of the parents who had nothing else to compare their educations to and feel a public school education will adequately prepare their children for the real world?

  19. bobby rocwell wrote:

    take a look at this video on the black family
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2hO0isPW2c

  20. Emi wrote:

    In the late 50’s my high school was the only one in our city. There was no other choice of schools to attend, which resulted in a majority of ‘white’ students, and a small percentage representing various nationalities, religions, ethnicities and cultures . We spent 3 of the best years of our lives together, with everyne expected to meet the high standards set since the 40’s, and everyone learning to get along in spite of differences. No quotas, special considerations or privileges. We elected a black student as our jr. class president. We elected a black student as our homecoming princess. We elected many hispanics as our representatives on student councils. A 2nd generation Japanese student l was elected our Sr. class president. We were not forced or coerced to vote for them for any reason. The entire student body voted for them because we liked them, and felt they were the best candidates. One of our classmates was the grand-son of one of the wealthiest families in town, and another, the
    great-granddaughter of slaves. They received an equal education, had the same teachers, the same classes, the same requirements for graduation, and both worked hard but had fun at the same time. He attended our local state college and became a nationally recognized leader in business. She went to Jr. College and night school to get a teaching degree, and ended her career as our Superintendent of Schools. If voters would take the politics and politicians out of public education, and vote intelligently, our children would not have to suffer inadequate schools and lowered expectations. Next election, before you waste your vote on a candidate because of his or her perceived charm and speaking ability, don’t be fooled by slogans and promises. Educate yourself. Study their past voting records and history, and study their party platform. Personally, I have only heard of one political party advocating vouchers to help parents get access to the best education available for their kids, and one candidate for the last 3 election cycles making vouchers a priority. It is time for people to get serious about every minority kids future, and stop wasting votes that keep them enslaved in a system that almost guarantees their failure. It is unacceptable that a minority child can only have a quality education if their parents are wealthy, or President and First Lady. The black and hispanic community should not be looking to more money and government intervention as the answer . How about all of the wealthy and upper income blacks (Oprah, entertainers, and athletes come to mind) getting together and privately funding vouchers for every American child? A pittance to them, but a far better investment than spending millions on bling and taking employees on cruises.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.