ARP Tuesday Links

On Privilege and Responsibility: Natasha Sky wrote a great post in response to last week’s discussions of privilege here on ARP.

I do not want my kids to grow up thinking they are simply ‘lucky’ and other kids are ‘unlucky’. It’s definitely not that simple. There are individual and institutional daily choices being made (as they have been for hundreds of years) that consistently privilege certain groups of people above others. People are privileged based on race (both perceived and actual), skin tone, gender, sexuality, religion, income, education, marital status, and physical ability, to name some of the most common factors.

I believe those of us who find ourselves more privileged in this world do owe something to those who are less privileged. I often wonder what would happen if we each did all we could for those who–for whatever reasons–have less privilege today than we do. What does true activism look like? Is it enough to speak out against offensive jokes and comments, to be an anti-racist parent, and to purchase a cartful of groceries for the food-shelf once a month? Can I expect the world to change if I am not working towards that change myself? Can I expect someone else to step up and do something I myself am unwilling to do?

(Belatedly) In Honor of Father’s Day:  Last week, dads took over the Mocha Moms segment on NPR’s “Tell Me More.” Listen to Jeff Steele, Jason Sperber and Keith Morton weigh in on parenting from father’s perspective.

Persons of White Privilege: Professor What If suggests adding a new label to the anti-racist lexicon as step toward acknowleging racial privilege.

Now, in terms of linguistic equality, it doesn’t seem fair that some identities are (assumed to be) summed up in one word, while others require a whole string of complex descriptions. Let’s call it being ‘linguistically oppressed.’ In order to counter this oppression, I suggest a first move would be to begin calling ‘white people’ ‘people of white privilege’ instead. Just as the phrase ‘people of color’ nods to the system of racism that works against all of those without white privilege, the term ‘people of white privilege’ (or POWP), would own up to the fact that white skin, to borrow a phrase from the famous “Got Milk” add campaign, ‘does a body good.’ White privilege, as Peggy McIntosh and many others have so thoroughly elucidated, bestows one with all sorts of perks. The closing points of her widely anthologized piece, “White Privilege: Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack,” are well worth considering more closely:

Share and Enjoy:These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us
  • digg
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Furl
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • co.mments

Trackbacks & Pings

  1. jeff steele on 22 Jul 2008 at 11:23 am

    […] […]

Comments

  1. gm wrote:

    Speaking of privilege and responsibility, I find myself quite often, recently, being in the company of new coworkers who don’t quite know what to take of my light skin. Some must take me for a white women because some of the things they have said to me have been offensive. As it is the case with me when I’ve been offended in anyway I usually put my sentiments in poetry form. Therefore, this is my response to those who don’t know and those who refuse to care.

    What Am I

    I’m the dark freckle on my face
    The ancestor that lies just below
    The pale covering of my soul

    I’m the hurt, the pain and fustration
    To my core
    Of words used to cut
    The inner surface of my trust

    I’m Harlem
    In and out
    Through and through
    I love my people
    Just like you

    So the next time you need to ask
    Or just complain
    Just remember
    Who I am
    I’m not the same….

    gm

  2. Jeremy Pierce wrote:

    I’m not sure how the term ‘people of color’ nods to a system of oppression. The term itself simply refers to what people look like, even if it’s sort of inaccurate (white is a color, and the color white people are is actually not white anyway). But starting from the idea that ‘people of color’ already is a nod to an oppressive system seems to me to suggest that ‘white’ already is also such a nod, and that sort of undermines the argument for making the oppression more explicit unless you also want to say “people of less ” every time you refer to someone of color, including very rich ones.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.