Review of Weaving a Family: Untangling Race and Adoption

by Anti-Racist Parent columnist Cloudscome

Weaving a Family: Untangling Race and Adoption by Barbara Katz Rothman. Beacon Press, 2005.

Rothman is a professor of sociology at Baruch College, CUNY. She’s written several other books on motherhood, giving birth, race, and gender. In Weaving a Family Rothman talks about her own experience as a white mother of three children; two white whom she gave birth to and one black and adopted. She moves back and forth between telling her own family’s story and discussing the wider social, economic and cultural implications of mixed race families. Although she is an academic writer, the tone and style is conversational and engaging. There is a very illuminating interview with Ms. Rothman at Literary Mama which gives a good overview of the book and lays out her opinions on many issues.

In the first section of the book Rothman talks about adoption and tells the story of her own family. She says, “In a better world, adoption would all but disappear, leaving us infertility as a problem that still needed to be addressed on its own terms. And in a better world, race too would almost cease to exist; race as a system of power and domination would collapse. Ethnicity, community based on heritage, would or could continue, but race, with all of its history of horror, would disappear.” Up until this point in the book I was thinking of race as a good thing, along the lines of strong identity, etc. As she unpacks the repressive elements of racism and it’s effects on Black families I began to see that the positive thing is ethnicity. Categorizing people by race is a tool of oppression and violence. A world that didn’t recognize race but honored ethnicity would be a world of greater freedom and equity. I am curious to see what others think of this. Do you consider race to have a positive connotation or is it only a means of oppression?

After extensive discussion on race as understood biologically, socially, historically, and contrasted with an understanding of ethnicity, Rothman dissects what it means for a white parent to mother, or do the work of nurturing and raising, a Black child. As a sociologist she had access to the Schomburg Center for Research in Black Culture. She studied the images, stories and histories contained there and organized them into themes. She calls is a “typology, a description of the various ways this relationship has been imagined, done, thought about.” She says, “I’m taking this image, the black child at the white breast, the little black hand trustingly placed in the big white one, the white mother with her black child, and tracing it back.”

She focuses on three motifs: Proteges, Pets, and Trophies. She recognizes that none of these descriptions are attractive or desirable. Nor are they limited to families of adoption. There could be a whiff of these tendencies in any parenting relationship. What is gained by categorizing these types is a certain clarity; a historical context for our current parenting. She acknowledges that this is an ugly way to look at ourselves and our children. No one wants to see their child as a protege, a pet or a trophy. Nevertheless, by closely examining a historic perspective she finds some useful truths.

The mentor and protege relationship is compared to the traditional father - child relationship. Fathers act as bridges into the wider world for their children. “Fathers share their place in the world with their children, passing on names and identity, privilege, position, and property.” The role of pet is described as more of a mother’s indigence toward babies and small children. The third category, of trophy, relates to the way children represent our identity in the world. They display our taste, discernment, status, wealth, and values.

In analyzing these three modes Rothman points out some of the complexity of multiracial families in our racist culture. When one or both parents are white the child with dark skin is still called Black. Having white parents doesn’t make one white. Although middle class white parents may mentor their children and attempt to give access to privilege and power, the Black child grows up to become a Black adult with all that it entails. The Black/white divide seems immutable.

In comparing mothering small children to caring for pets Rothman points out the innate capacity of humans to attach to smaller, needier companions. The difference in indulging one’s cat with treats and doing the work of raising a child is made apparent when the child grows up independent and the relationship becomes reciprocal. If the child is marked by society as being less valuable (because of disability, race, apparent minority status or the like) the mother’s nurturing behavior may come into question. The child is not always seen as “your own” if he/she doesn’t look like a match. Rothman says, “When a child, a healthy child, is born to you, you don’t distinguish, you’re not asked to distinguish, the narcissistic part of your love from the altruistic. When you take care of that child, no one asks you why. But direct that nurturance towards a child the world has made clear it will not value, and not only motivation but the very legitimacy of your actions are up for question. The joys of nurturance, the self-indulgence of parenting, the pleasures of mothering are made apparent when their legitimacy is questioned.”

The “trophy child” takes it one step farther. If an adopted child is seen as a trophy it is because of what acquiring the child says about the parent or the world the parent seeks. Rothman mentions the idea that some white people may use connections to Black friends, partners, or children in order to make a statement. She also gives the example of Josephine Baker (African American) who adopted twelve children from all around the world. She wanted to have a “rainbow family”. She went around the world with her husband collecting children from different countries and adopting them in the 1950s. Rothman states that Baker seemed to genuinely love her children. Pearl S. Buck (European American) is another example of someone who adopted children in a “rainbow” family and made a statement about families in the process. Rothman says, “It requires a position of privilege to begin to think about “collecting” children. The trophy child says something about who the parent is; this kind of collection is one type of trophy. The “rainbow tribe,” as Baker called it, is an attempt to remake the world, with the family as a little UN, the parent(s) as visionaries.” Rebecca Walker, the daughter of Alice Walker, calls herself a “MovementChild”. Her white Jewish civil rights lawyer father and her black mother meant to make a new world for their daughter to inhabit. The problem here, Rothman points out, is that we are expecting the little child to lead us. In this type of attempt to remake the world without race we are using race for that purpose. “We celebrate race, we take pleasure in it, as we overcome race. It is a way of thinking about race that involves not thinking about race, denying its significance, its politics, and its history.” A child who starts out as a trophy soon finds the burden heavy and unwieldy. The world they grow up to inhabit is not yet ready. The back of a child is not meant to be a bridge.

A great deal of the second half of the book is about how white women learn of their whiteness from having Black children. She considers how we (white people) often don’t know we are white until we “belong” to a Black child, or a Black partner. We discover the shock of being, not the only white person in a room full of Blacks, but an aware white person in a room full of whites who are not thinking about being white. You may look like every other white person, but you don’t feel or think or react like one. There will be the time you are going along at the meeting or conference or whatever and something is said; something racist or not, some assumption of whiteness or privilege and no one reacts. You are alone and baffled. Or here’s another situation: you’re the only white person in a room of African Americans. You feel like you know what’s going on, you are partaking of the events, you’re happily enjoying yourself. Something comes up that brings race onto the stage. A white cop strolls by, an incident is mentioned, a joke is told. You don’t know how to react. Will you be judged? Are you too white to respond? Will there be anger directed at you? Is the joke on you?

Twoards the end of the book Rothman discusses hair care in the context of culture/diversity celebrations, identity, and entitlement. She tells about how her family is woven together, how adoption has changed, how the world has changed in the past forty or fifty years. She says in the book she is “tracing the tensions between the intimate, personal lives we lead and the social contexts in which we lead them.” I highly recommend this book to anyone interested in these topics and I invite your response here.

Cloudscome has three sons. She is a library-media specialist and blogs at http://awrungsponge.blogspot.com.

Share and Enjoy:These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us
  • digg
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Furl
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • co.mments

Trackbacks & Pings

  1. Melting Pot or Mosaic « Shanan Trail on 28 Feb 2008 at 10:26 am

    […] What does it mean to become white? She considers how we (white people) often don’t know we are white until we “belong” to a Black child, or a Black partner. We discover the shock of being, not the only white person in a room full of Blacks, but an aware white person in a room full of whites who are not thinking about being white. You may look like every other white person, but you don’t feel or think or react like one. There will be the time you are going along at the meeting or conference or whatever and something is said; something racist or not, some assumption of whiteness or privilege and no one reacts. You are alone and baffled. Anti-Racist Parent columnist Cloudscome, Review of Weaving a Family: Untangling Race and Adoption. […]

  2. More on Race (And Gender) for Kids on 14 Mar 2008 at 3:40 pm

    […] for parents who are committed to raising children with an anti-racist outlook.” I just read a review of Weaving a Family, a Beacon Press book about a white mother of several children, including a black daughter. Little […]

Comments

  1. Patti wrote:

    Ordering this book tonight! Thank you!

  2. dontmesswithmommy wrote:

    It seems like not a second (literally, a second) goes by where I am not thinking about these issues as we wait to travel in April to bring home our child. Sometimes I feel like I am going crazy questioning my true motivations for adopting a child of color and how these motivations will affect our child. I bought this book hoping for advice for transracial families, but it was much more valuable and unsettling than that. Thank you for your post.

  3. Hannah wrote:

    I have not read this book, but just the synopses makes me really not want to read it.
    I do , enjoy statements about the power and privilege that takes place in a racist society. But that is about all I liked.

    The issues of Transracial adoption is my passion. I am a Korean Transracial Transnational Adoptee and more then anything this is what I love to study talk about and create change for. My instant response to this article is that
    A. Im tiered of hearing birth parents give their little this is how I raised my Child of Color stuff, there is a huge generation from the 80’s adoption boom that are in their 20-30 lets start hearing what they have to say about their lives and experiences. Its what is lacking in research and the understanding of transracial adoption as a whole. I mean for goodness sakes Adoptee isn’t even seen as a real word in spell check. Its not only a word its an identity that people need to start validating.
    B. There are better ways to talk about transracial adoption and race then breaking down parenting into three ridiculous categories. Lets talk about the way that racism as a whole plays out in adoption. That the agencies are an industry, not some god sent. I want to have a conversation about how the medias portrait of adoption of Children of Color not only as a fashion trend but also the greatest thing white liberals can do to be a part of the Great White Hope. How about the cultural prostitution that takes place of adopted children’s birth culture by adoptive parents.
    I could go on about all the things that I think are lacking and the real issues that white parents usually dont talk about.

    Her half a book on whitness and how belonging to a black child shows that? I think these women should read not how their Black child should or has made them realize how white they are but read something like “privilege, power, and difference” by Allan Johnson a 156 pg book that just starts to skim the complications of what power and privilege means.

    I think this book sounds better then most “Im a white mommy/daddy of a Child of Color” books that I have read but I still think it sounds lacking and failing to get to the real issues of adoption. If you really want an interesting read on adoption check out “outsiders within: writings on transracial adoption” edited by Jane Jeong Trenka, Julia Chinyere Oparah , and Sun Yung Shin. Its one of the most real and interesting pieces I’ve read and I do my research folks!

  4. Brooklyn Mama wrote:

    I really liked this book too. I felt, even if the author didn’t, that it spoke to the experience of white parents of Asian children as well.

  5. cloudscome wrote:

    Thanks Hannah I appreciate your comment. I am reading outsiders within too. I’d love to read your review of that and any other books you would recommend. I’ll start looking for the Allan Johnson book. No one or two books can cover all there is to talk about so my reading list keeps getting longer.

    I have to add that I had a hard time writing this review because there was so much in the book and I couldn’t talk about all of it. The original review was twice this long and I kept cutting it so it would be readable. I had to focus on just a few things. There is a lot more someone else might chose to highlight. Has anyone else read it and gotten different points they would respond to?

  6. Tea wrote:

    I’ve been doing a lot of reading since we are already (white) adoptive parents of an Asian child and will soon be adoptive parents of a black child. No we are not “collecting” a “rainbow” family. We are just trying to build a family! I am very concerned about race issues, how they will affect our children and how they affect society. Until now all of the reading I have done has been from the grown child’s point of view. Obviously, they are the ones that will be affected the most, but the parents’ perspective could also be helpful since I will be floundering, trying to do my best to help my children fit in ethnically. During this, I will also be trying to fit in ethnically. I am already struggling with this, as the book synopsis suggests, realizing I am white and not necessarily comfortable with all that implies. I would be interested in hearing about some books that offer solutions and practices to help alleviate the heartbreak that many, if not most of the stories retell about children of color growing up to find themselves outside of the culture they grew up in. The closest I’ve found so far is “Dreams from My Father”, by Barack Obama. Other suggestions would be welcome (sorry, not trying to be political - just a good book about a multiracial family and a man coming to terms with race). Any suggestions?

  7. Maureen wrote:

    “Do you consider race to have a positive connotation or is it only a means of oppression?”

    I consider race to be a label of division, and thus something that in the context of my communities, has more capacity to harm than to be useful.

    But — and as I’ve read this site long enough I’ve gotten more angry — a great deal of you would choose to label me White, my children White, and thus assume oh so racistly, that I wore my babies because I am a rich White woman, that when I take my daughter to hip-hop that I am trying to appropriate, and basically that I have little to offer you. And believe me I’ve already been told that I am ignorant and backwards for refusing to teach my children to divide others up into neat little racial boxes, which are hardly so neat from the year and place where I’m sitting.

    So, yeah, I think it’s a great tool for distracting people from ideas, from analysis, from love, from better concepts like good choices and bad choices, from caring more about what someone’s skin tones might mean about where their genes may have been 500 years ago than what her name is.

    I have told my children that peoples who lived closer to the equator could carry more protective pigment without sacrificing Vitamin D production, but now that we have planes and trains and boats, phones and e-mail, sun lamps and fish oil in bottles, people move all over and marry each other and it doesn’t mean very much any more. I know some of you have good arguments for why we should hang on, hang on, hang on to race, but at some point it just has to stop.

    There are no guarantees in life that nothing bad will ever happen to you. The only thing we are charged with as people is doing the best we know.

  8. Missy wrote:

    Maureen.
    I am bi-racial, but people often think I am a white ethnic (Sicilian, Greek, etc.).
    I sympathize with your pain as a white person in a racist world. You are not responsible for the things our ancestors have done. Neither am I. As you say, we all must do the best we know.

    However, I think it is best to walk in humility, and to accept as TRUTH what others who are the target of racism say about their experiences. I have never had to experience racism. In fact, I have probably profited from my black blood because it’s the ‘cool’ thing to be multiracial.

    “At some point it just has to stop” is not a legitimate reaction unless you have experienced racism yourself. You, and I,will never be able to experience the brunt of racism that unmistakably non-white people face. Especially black people with very dark skin. We will always be outsiders, and it is our job to listen respectfully and be unfront about our privilege. Tiring? Yes. Frustrating? Yes. But is there the possibility of empowering others in the process through this act of faith –that we have faith that what they say about racism is not crap? Yes!

    But it’s not just all about blind faith…if you necessarily notice racism (as I did, being 50% raised by a black father, and being raised to listen to his tirades on race constantly LOL) you start to see things that others do not.

    In my middle school for example, things I noticed as a child. The way my teacher told me I was using the wrong crayon color (chocolate) for my Dad when I colored in a picture of my Dad. The way that everyone ignored the new boy in class, Carlos (an Indian looking Mexican-American), even though I knew he was very attractive, but also that everyone would make fun of me if I admitted that I had a crush on him. The way my heart went out to the only little black boy in the classroom when we talked about slavery. At age 12, the way that no one went to my friend Steve’s Kwanzaa party except me and three others, even though he was just as nice, and funny, and smart as any other boy in our class.
    I could go on and on…(and describe all the racial slurs I’ve heard from those who assume I’m white) but these are just some simple little examples.

    And there is a feeling of power in that, not just hopelessness. Since if WE can see, others can as well.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.