Why do we expect adoptees to be grateful?

by Anti-Racist Parent columnist Margie Perscheid, originally published at Third Mom

The concept that my children should be grateful to my husband and me for having adopted them has always been offensive to me. And if it’s offensive to me, how much more so must it be to my kids and to other adoptees! The first problem is that I just don’t get it. The closest parallel I can draw is something my mother used to tell me really infuriated her - the fact that her father always wanted her to thank him for bringing her from Slovenia to the U.S. Mom is 83 and she still talks about how much it aggravated her. “After all,” she says every time the subject comes up, “I was only three when he brought us over and I had no say in it. Why did he expect me to thank him all the time for it?”

As I said, that’s as close as I can get - and the comparison is pretty weak. After all, Mom knows her family, she knows her name, her heritage, her history. To be expected to show gratitude for an event that is tied to enormous losses - especially losses that the rest of humankind considers fundamental - is exponentially more difficult.

When I was a newer a-mom, I didn’t understand this. I viewed the intertwining of gratitude and adoption in terms of who should be grateful: “Oh, no, I’M the one who’s grateful! I’m the one who’s blessed!” Or sometimes I viewed in terms of the what: “No, I’m no saint for adopting, and my children shouldn’t be grateful for it.” I was responding with focus on me, not on my kids, when I should have been focusing on my kids, and on the why.

Focusing on the why brings the dialog to the losses: “Actually, my children shouldn’t be expected to be grateful for having lost their families, heritage, and homeland - especially since that could have been prevented in the first place. And I am as guilty as the next person for having done nothing.” It’s not a perfect response, but it opens up the door to deeper conversation, and may get someone thinking outside of the mainstream box. At a minimum, it sends the message that the concept of gratitude for adoption is plain wrong. And because I’m sure that someone is thinking it - heck, I’m thinking it - there is hypocrisy in this approach. To that, I can only say, yes, but it shouldn’t stop me and other a-parents from speaking out.

The real challenge, though, is finding ways to talk about this with my kids. We haven’t yet had a discussion specifically focused on this topic. Instead, as occasions have arisen, we’ve talked about it in other contexts. The kids haven’t shared their thoughts many thoughts on this, and it worries me that they may already be burdened with their feelings, but are saying nothing. Hopefully if I keep grabbing opportunities to talk, they’ll be able to open up a bit more.

As to why society places the burden of gratitude on adoptees - my theory is pretty simple, albeit cynical. I believe the mainstream views adoption through a lens of charity. People who have plenty are encouraged to give - and the poor are conditioned to be grateful. If adopting is viewed as a charitable act by adoptive parents, it follows that its recipients - adoptees - must be grateful, too. It is a deeply entrenched attitude. You can find it in the media, in our laws, in adoption policy, in a conversation with a neighbor over your back fence. And of course, our children will find it, too.

All the more reason to counter with reality, whenever we can.

Margie Perscheid is the adoptive mother of two Korean teens. She is a co-founder of Korean Focus, an organization for families with children from Korea with chapters across the country. Margie is on the Board of Directors of the Korean American Coalition DC Chapter, a former board member of KAAN, the Korean YMCA of Greater Washington (now KAYA), and ASIA (Adoption Service Information Agency). Margie writes about her intercountry adoption experiences at Third Mom. She, her husband Ralf, and their two children live in Alexandria, Virginia.

Share and Enjoy:These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us
  • digg
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Furl
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • co.mments

Trackbacks & Pings

  1. Strollerderby : Why Should Adoptive Kids Feel Grateful? on 27 May 2007 at 1:58 pm

    […] Anti-racist parent bloggers ask the question: Why should adoptees be grateful?  Author Margie Perscheid summarizes this way: I believe the mainstream views adoption through a lens of charity. People who have plenty are encouraged to give - and the poor are conditioned to be grateful.Those who receive charity (adoptees) are meant to feel gratitude.   Children, no matter how they come into our lives owe us no debt of gratitude at all.  Parents who wait around to feel deeply thoughtfully appreciated for choosing to make a family with their children, are in for a long, hard, disappointing wait.Kids who are adopted owe no more gratitude to their parents than biological children.  And to think otherwise will create a poison environment of resentment between parent and child. [vis Anti-Racist Parent]  […]

Comments

  1. daisy wrote:

    Wow, great post. The one reason, though, to keep the focus on the parent might be because the child doesn’t want attention on them. I agree, though: no adopted kid is “lucky” because if they were “lucky” they’d be with their first family, who just won the lottery (or something like that).

    Do you really hear this a lot? Because I can count on one hand the number of times the word “lucky” has come up in the past year with my son.

  2. Vera L wrote:

    This is a timely post for me. I just had a conversation with my 9 year old last night about his feelings about being adopted. It started with him saying “I wish . . . ” and moving on to talk about all the things he could have had with his birth family that he does not have in his adoptive family. At first, he was tentative “Mommy, I don’t want to hurt your feelings.” Once I let him know I was OK with it, the floodgates opened. Of course, in his mind, his birth family would have been perfect — since he’s only 9, that makes sense. He was sad and he was angry at all the things he lost. The conversation went on through the evening, off and on. We read the “Mulberry Bird” for his bedtime book, and talked a little more, and the night finally ended with him saying “Sometimes I wish I’d never been adopted” and rolling over to go to sleep. Gratitude? Furthest thing from his mind. I, on the other hand, was extremely grateful (that word again) that he trusted me enough to share his feelings with me. And I was really wishing for that magic wand — the one that makes all the hurt go away.

  3. dharmamama wrote:

    I hope that my kids, when they grow up, will understand that love for them motivated me to do what I thought best for them at every stage of our lives together. They don’t have to like what I have done or be grateful, but I hope that they understand that I did my best. This goes for my bio and my adopted kids.

  4. Denise wrote:

    “Because I can count on one hand the number of times the word “lucky” has come up in the past year with my son.”

    Then you are very lucky Daisy (no pun intended!)

    My son has been here about a year and a half, and I have lost count of how many ties I have heard that word. It goes right up my spine, and my responses have ranged from silence, to quiet disagreement, to outright anger and snappy retorts.

    I have since sorted through my emotions on this, and am usually able to respond at least diplomatically, if nothing else. Like Margie, I used to quickly reply “No, I’m the lucky one.”

    The hardest is answering to this when your child is there with you. At 10, my son is old enough to understant a lot. I don’t want him growing up feeling like he should be grateful.

  5. zoe wrote:

    Thanks for this, Margie. I agree with you about using people’s comments to open a dialog about the losses inherent in adoption. I never have the perfect words, but I’ve decided that if people even hint about ‘better life’ or ‘lucky’ or even just how wonderful it is, I must say something….and I do.

    Daisy - I personally have had very few people tell me how ‘lucky’ my son is, in so few words. However, the frequent comments about how wonderful adoption is, how wonderful it is that people adopt, and how many opportunities the child will have in America (alongside the fact that people are totally disinclined to acknowledge any of the very real losses - instead they brush them aside or even say/imply that it was worth it to lose everything in order to gain a family in America) ….those comments add up to basically saying the child is lucky, and implying that s/he should or would be grateful to have been adopted. The same message is sent, whether the exact words are spoken or not.

    Vera - thanks for sharing about your experience with your son.

  6. shanamadele wrote:

    Thank you for this post. I have been hearing how “lucky” my son is since the moment I began telling people that I was planning to adopt a child.

    It was an easy jump for me to saying that I was the lucky one — but that did not satisfy me, either. That still left the focus on our gratitude, without acknowledging the pain involved in adoption. I appreciate your giving me more ways to think about how to respond — and articulating so clearly why it is important.

  7. JC wrote:

    Why shouldn’t the adoptees show a little gratitue. Gratitues towards their adoptive parents and adoptive country. Why teach them to be selfish adults who feel “entitled” to show zero gratitude of being taken out of countires/cultures that might have mistreated them (orphans) if they were not adopted by loving families in the U.S.?
    Americans are so strange.

  8. Kim wrote:

    JC…

    is the opposite of expressing gratitude, the expression of selfishness? I think not.

    A child (and here in America it is almost a running joke in films and on television) does not have to be ‘grateful’ for being provided the basic necessities of life. A child’s full and natural expectation (divine expectation and right?) are that its basic needs will be met.

    A parent cannot reasonably expect a child to manifest a beggar’s emoted gratitude for doing that which the parent has signed on for doing.

    When one intentionally parents, as adoptive parents have chosen to do, one has signed on to give, give, give. Not things, but the basic conditions and tenets of family: warmth, support, love, kindness, discipline, cultural values, education of some sort, food, shelter of some sort, and protection.

    Neither adoptive parents nor bio-parents are instilling in children the right “to show zero gratitude,” in life.

    A child who is forever told that they should be grateful for their place in the family, or their hold on life, will come at some time to realize that they are conditionally holding to that place; conditionally laying claim to full inclusion in that life.

    As you may well know, parents sign on here to that mythical treatise of Unconditional Love towards their children…and then the children challenge them at every turn after puberty and make us “put our money where our mouths are.”

  9. laura wrote:

    As a 26 year old Korean adoptee, now 8 1/2 months pregnant, I can comment from firsthand experience at how astonishingly absurd the idea of compulsory gratitude is in this context. People have commented to me throughout my life “You must be so grateful to your parents for adopting you.” My response to them is to bluntly say “Not really” and continue to explain that as a teenager I was a rebellious self-centered brat. But what normal teen isn’t? The point is that acting “grateful” or whatever would be so abnormal and unnatural for a healthy parent-child relationship. I am grateful to my parents for putting up with me, grateful for their guidance, direction, and love, etc. But I have no expectation that my son will feel “thankful” that I forgot to renew my birth control prescription!

  10. Lyonside wrote:

    Kim: that was well said. This in particular, “A child who is forever told that they should be grateful for their place in the family, or their hold on life, will come at some time to realize that they are conditionally holding to that place; conditionally laying claim to full inclusion in that life.”

    It reminded me of other situations other than TRA - the foster child in an adequate but less than loving home, the nephew or grandchild who grows up being reminded that their mother couldn’t take care of them and that they’re lucky to be there, the stepchild in a blended family…

    Even in a lesser way in my own family: my parents never married, and my dad was a part-time co-parent. Starting in middle school, he suddenly started paying some of my school tuition, prompting my mother to remind me about twice a year to thank my father. It felt weird then and I didn’t know exactly why, except that his weekly unscheduled visits disrupted my evening routine as it was, and it felt weird to thank my dad while not thanking my mom for her 2 jobs that paid some of that tuition too (as well as everything else).

    “Gratitude” is a poor substitute for genuine affection. While they can coexist in the same relationship, it makes it difficult to be as honest and open as we would hope any relationship to be.

  11. Jen wrote:

    It makes me very uncomfortable when people say that my son is “lucky” that we adopted him. I just try to remember that most of the time it’s mean in a nice way and that the person saying it just hasn’t really thought out what they’re saying. I always tell people that actually my husband and I are the lucky ones. I guess even that doesn’t feel totally right though.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.